Tutor: Bill
Stu- 188086
In this following essay, I am going to compare and contrast two pieces of work, one from an artist who has personally inspired and influenced me as an artist, the great fantasy artist Boris Vallejo. The other piece of work is from my own portfolio that reflects some elements of Vallejo’s work. The pieces I have selected are an Oil painting from 1997 named ‘Mistress of the Storm’ (Shown Right) by Boris Vallejo, and an Acrylic painting from 2010 named ‘Jasmine’ (Bottom)by painted by myself.
The painting ‘Mistress of the Storm’ depicts a very goddess like figure. A perfectly sculpted woman is levitating in an angry and stormy sky who has thunder like electricity emanating from her fingertips, as if she is able to control the element of Thunder. Reflecting on the woman’s face, she has quite an angry and powerful look upon her. I feel her expression compliments the background very nicely, and also, her outfit she is wearing has thunder like shapes within it, which ties in rather nicely with this piece. By using colours mainly from the ‘Warm’ pallet, such as reds and yellows, which makes up a good 80% of the painting. I believe this enhances the painting, and makes the womanly figure look more dominating and powerful.
Comparing to Vallejo’s piece is a painting by myself named ‘Jasmine’. It is a painting of one of my fellow art students which she requested me to paint. Her main feature I like are her eyes, which I have tried to capture as best I can. The colour of the background I chose very carefully to compliment her stunning eyes and further increase thier attractiveness. This was done by taking colours used to paint her eyes and abstracting them slightly, so they’re not the same colour, by still relating to the original tone. I also made tone of her hair and skin lighter, which effectively draws you into her eyes much more than it would of done normally with her hair and eyes being a darker tone.
On comparison, both my piece and Vallejo’s share enhancing elements within them. In my piece, I chose to change the tones of painting so it would accentuate certain features of the figure such as the eyes. In Vallejo’s piece, he uses complimentary colours that tie into the theme of the piece and also reflect on expression of the woman within the painting. Both my piece and Vallejo’s work originate from a secondary source, where both have been worked from photography resources. Vallejo keeps a very close relationship and friendship with all the models he uses, and often re-uses them in other work. I too can relate the importance of keeping a good relationship between the models in which I use for my work. I feel Vallejo’s piece is much more professional looking than my piece. His painting technique is also much more technical, and as a result, his painting is much more stunning. This though only makes me strive to become better, progress further, and eventually someday, become an artist as great as Boris Valejo
Alexander Osborne ND2 Art and Design
Monday, 6 December 2010
Saturday, 30 October 2010
Contextual Studies - Visual Analysis
Alexander Osborne
Stu- 188086
Tutor- Bill
For the following Visual Analysis essay, I have chosen the two following pieces of artwork, Helen Frankenthaler’s Untitled piece from 1982 and Georgia O’Keefe’s Red Hills 1927 (Red Hills with Sun). I am going to compare, relate and analyse both pieces in detail.
The first piece is by the female Wisconsin born Abstract Expressionist artist, Georgia O’Keefe, named Red Hills. It depicts the Autumn landscape of Lake George located in the Adirondack Mountains of New York. The Oil painting I feel is a very vibrant and warm piece, which I believe has been achieved through the use of burning and earthly tones that belong to the ‘Warm’ pallet of colours ( Yellows, Greenish Yellows, Oranges, Browns and Reds ). On some sections of the painting, she has used an effective wash technique, the main example of this would be the sky and sun. This technique was carried out by watering down the Oil paints using a chemical thinner, which is then applied to a damp canvas.
I rather enjoy the contrast between the solid red colour of the mountain plain, up against the lighter and more translucent colours of the sky. I feel it gives the painting real depth and texture, that would otherwise been lost by using just one painting technique. It’s essential when using Oil paints on canvas, that the canvas is primed correctly, otherwise the chemicals within the Oil paints will eventually corrode and rot canvas material.
The second piece is by another female artist, the New York born Helen Frankenthaler. Helen was a pioneer of the colour field movement, which is associated with the second - generation abstract expressionists. She primarily draws from landscapes for her inspiration, this Untitled landscape piece reflects her inspiration in a very abstract way. I feel the piece has a rather cool and fresh feel to it. With the use cold blue colours and tranquil tones that considerably contribute to the cool feel of the piece, combined with her ‘field’ painting style plus her mastered ‘soak- stain’ painting technique, the resulting look to the painting is very refreshing to the eye and visually has a very silky smooth texture to it.
She uses thinned down Acrylic paint that is applied onto a damp un - primed canvas to create her soak - stain paintings. By restricting the application of water to certain parts of the canvas ( for example in this piece, the upper white section of the painting ) she was able to control the areas in which the liquefied Acrylic will bleed into. Applying more or less water and Acrylic to certain sections of the painting controlled the overall texture of this piece.
In comparison, both pieces are paintings, but on opposite sides of the scale. Georgia O’Keefe’s Red Hills is a very warm painting which uses colours from the ‘Warm’ pallet of colours, and Helen Frankenthaler’s uses colours from the ’Cold’ pallet. Both paintings fall into Abstract, but Helen’s painting is much more expressionistic compared to more traditionally painted modernist painting of O’Keefe. Because of this, the viewer of O’Keefe’s Red Hills, needs not look into the painting as hard, but may need to look at Helen’s piece with a bit more depth to discover its true meaning. In the 1960’s, O’Keefe switched to using Acrylics, which she used in this painting, whilst Helen stuck to using the more traditional and more established at the time Oil paints. Even though they are painted using different mediums and colours, they do share an element of texture. The washed effect on the sky in O’Keefe’s piece, I feel can also be put into the same tribute as the stained effect that features on Helen’s piece.
Overall, it would be hard to chose between the piece I like the most, it would probably be Red Hills due to its simplistic but detailed quality compared to the Untitled pieces which is more cruder but still at the same time is also simplistic.
Stu- 188086
Tutor- Bill
For the following Visual Analysis essay, I have chosen the two following pieces of artwork, Helen Frankenthaler’s Untitled piece from 1982 and Georgia O’Keefe’s Red Hills 1927 (Red Hills with Sun). I am going to compare, relate and analyse both pieces in detail.
The first piece is by the female Wisconsin born Abstract Expressionist artist, Georgia O’Keefe, named Red Hills. It depicts the Autumn landscape of Lake George located in the Adirondack Mountains of New York. The Oil painting I feel is a very vibrant and warm piece, which I believe has been achieved through the use of burning and earthly tones that belong to the ‘Warm’ pallet of colours ( Yellows, Greenish Yellows, Oranges, Browns and Reds ). On some sections of the painting, she has used an effective wash technique, the main example of this would be the sky and sun. This technique was carried out by watering down the Oil paints using a chemical thinner, which is then applied to a damp canvas.
I rather enjoy the contrast between the solid red colour of the mountain plain, up against the lighter and more translucent colours of the sky. I feel it gives the painting real depth and texture, that would otherwise been lost by using just one painting technique. It’s essential when using Oil paints on canvas, that the canvas is primed correctly, otherwise the chemicals within the Oil paints will eventually corrode and rot canvas material.
The second piece is by another female artist, the New York born Helen Frankenthaler. Helen was a pioneer of the colour field movement, which is associated with the second - generation abstract expressionists. She primarily draws from landscapes for her inspiration, this Untitled landscape piece reflects her inspiration in a very abstract way. I feel the piece has a rather cool and fresh feel to it. With the use cold blue colours and tranquil tones that considerably contribute to the cool feel of the piece, combined with her ‘field’ painting style plus her mastered ‘soak- stain’ painting technique, the resulting look to the painting is very refreshing to the eye and visually has a very silky smooth texture to it.
She uses thinned down Acrylic paint that is applied onto a damp un - primed canvas to create her soak - stain paintings. By restricting the application of water to certain parts of the canvas ( for example in this piece, the upper white section of the painting ) she was able to control the areas in which the liquefied Acrylic will bleed into. Applying more or less water and Acrylic to certain sections of the painting controlled the overall texture of this piece.
In comparison, both pieces are paintings, but on opposite sides of the scale. Georgia O’Keefe’s Red Hills is a very warm painting which uses colours from the ‘Warm’ pallet of colours, and Helen Frankenthaler’s uses colours from the ’Cold’ pallet. Both paintings fall into Abstract, but Helen’s painting is much more expressionistic compared to more traditionally painted modernist painting of O’Keefe. Because of this, the viewer of O’Keefe’s Red Hills, needs not look into the painting as hard, but may need to look at Helen’s piece with a bit more depth to discover its true meaning. In the 1960’s, O’Keefe switched to using Acrylics, which she used in this painting, whilst Helen stuck to using the more traditional and more established at the time Oil paints. Even though they are painted using different mediums and colours, they do share an element of texture. The washed effect on the sky in O’Keefe’s piece, I feel can also be put into the same tribute as the stained effect that features on Helen’s piece.
Overall, it would be hard to chose between the piece I like the most, it would probably be Red Hills due to its simplistic but detailed quality compared to the Untitled pieces which is more cruder but still at the same time is also simplistic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)